The Historical Origins of the Privilege Against Self-Incrimination at Common Law
نویسنده
چکیده
The appearance of the privilege against self-incrimination the guaranty that no person "shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself"' was a landmark event in the history of Anglo-American criminal procedure. Prior historical scholarship has located the origins of the common law privilege in the second half of the seventeenth century, as part of the aftermath of the constitutional struggles that resulted in the abolition of the courts of Star Chamber and High Commission. This essay explains that the true origins of the common law privilege are to be found not in the high politics of the English revolutions, but in the rise of adversary criminal procedure at the end of the eighteenth century. The privilege against self-incrimination at common law was the work of defense counsel. From the middle of the sixteenth century, when sources first allow us to glimpse the conduct of early modem criminal trials,2 until late in the eighteenth century, the fundamental safeguard for the defendant in common law criminal procedure was not the right to remain silent, but rather the opportunity to speak. The essential purpose of the criminal trial was to afford the accused an opportunity to reply in person to the charges against him. Among the attributes of the procedure that imported this character to the criminal trial, the most fundamental was the rule that forbade defense counsel. The prohibition upon defense counsel was relaxed in stages from 1696 until 1836, initially
منابع مشابه
"Do you swear to tell the truth"?
Currently in the United States there is no federally recognized parentchild privilege. The U.S. Supreme Court has never granted certiorari in a case involving the recognition of a parent-child privilege. For many, it is a revelation to learn that the government can compel testimony about communications and observations between parents and their children. Scholars have written about the social p...
متن کاملDecrypting the Fifth Amendment: the Limits of Self- Incrimination in the Digital Era
Technology has outgrown the Supreme Court’s Fifth Amendment jurisprudence. This creates two distinct but related challenges. First, the scope of the “foregone conclusion” doctrine, which was originally formulated to address act-of-production issues for paper documents, is ripe for review and clarification now that documents are almost always digital and often encrypted. Second, the question of ...
متن کاملHealth care quality information liability & privilege.
As the General Counsel for the National Committee for Quality Assurance, which accredits health plans and measures outcome performance, Ms. Donohue is in a unique position to comment on the use of such data in litigation against health plans and providers. After reviewing the growing tide of class-action lawsuits in this area, she argues that such information should be protected under the commo...
متن کاملInstitutionalizing Inequality: the Political Origins of Labor Codes in Latin America
When do labor laws protect workers from workplace risks, and when do they serve to institute or insulate the privilege of particular political and economic actors? This paper argues that Latin American labor laws are highly politicized, and have been since their early origins. In the early decades of the twentieth century, the first labor codes were formulated to favor skilled, unionized labor ...
متن کامل